Home On the spot Angels, Aliens, Atwood and Other Archetypes

Angels, Aliens, Atwood and Other Archetypes

mining outpost (image by thelovas)
mining outpost (image by thelovas)

In a June 2005 issue of The Guardian, Canadian writer Margaret Atwood tells us “why we need science fiction” in an article entitled “Aliens Have Taken the Place of Angels”.

Atwood submits that “science fiction as a form is where theological narrative went after Paradise Lost…Extraterrestrials have taken the place of angels, demons, fairies and saints.” Science fiction, she submits, explores the relationship of humanity to the universe. It is “an exploration that often takes us in the direction of religion and can meld easily with mythology,” she says. She cites the obvious religious allegories of Star Wars and Matrix.

Author Brian Ott tells us that, “it is a profound mistake to interpret the genre [of science fiction] literally.” He reminds us that it is not what the aliens are but what they represent that matters. Science fiction is both “the great modern literature of metaphor” and “pre-eminently the modern literature not of physics but of metaphysics,” adds Peter Nicholls, Australian scholar and critic.

How we handle “the other” is a very compelling and illuminating topic. By describing “the other” science fiction writers describe “us”. Who we are and where we might go. It is, after all, through our own eyes that the other is described and viewed.

The most memorable aliens for me have been those that served to illuminate our history and our very humanity, Whether they played the archetype of simple antagonist or misunderstood as “commentator” on human prejudice, insecurities, greed, heroism, compassion and honor. I can think of several aliens who have provided excellent examples of this: the Martians in Ray Bradbury’s Martian Chronicles, Klaatu in The Day the Earth Stood Still, The aliens in Alien and the “prawns” of Peter Jackson’s District 9. Each provided a platform for the exploration and exposition of human’s strengths and weaknesses reflected in the hero.

In an article I wrote for Scribophile about publishing science fiction, I provided an example of our reaction to the “other”: District 9 by Neill Blomkamp, set aptly in an alternate present-day Johannesburg, in which visiting aliens have been incarcerated within filthy ghettos (see my review in The Alien Next Door). The heroic journey of the ordinary human Wikus van de Merwe reflects the global journey of humanity in reaction to the mysterious visitation of an alien race.  Blomkamp’s metaphors to our jaded history of prejudice and racism are clever and vary from the subtle to the obvious. While many viewers saw no further than the thrilling elements of the movie—alien visitation; kick-ass weapons and cool creatures getting blown up—District 9 conveyed a powerful allegory that asks unsettling questions about colonial powers. Critic Frederic Jameson reiterates, “Science Fiction is in its very nature a symbolic meditation on history itself.”

Two examples of aliens that span the full range from empathetic to incomprehensible include Spock in Star Trek and the ‘self-aware’ planet in Stanislaw Lem’s Solaris. Both provide excellent commentary on the human condition and what it means to be human (the prime focus of science fiction). Although Spock is very human-like in appearance, he behaves quite differently in culture, physiology and philosophy. This makes him a less intimidating commentator on humanity’s strengths and foibles. The audience identifies with Spock and feels compassion for him while acknowledging that he is different and accepts his commentary.

Solaris, on the other hand, epitomizes the “other”, a force and entity unrecognizable and unfathomable. Lem’s existentialist portrayal of “the other”— and of humanity—serves as excellent commentary on what is important to us and our identity. Unlike the familiar human-like figure of Spock, Solaris accomplishes this through arcane manipulation of our dreams and yearnings. We never understand its motivations or intelligence, yet we are drawn to its force and reflective mirror of our souls. It is its very incomprehensibility that attracts us, as to an abstract artwork, and challenges our very identities.

Ultimately, “We want wisdom,” says Atwood. “We want hope. We want to be good. Therefore we sometimes tell ourselves warning stories that deal with the darker side of some of our other wants.” Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale and Oryx and Crake, and her most recent After the Flood fulfill such exploration of humanity’s virtues—and vices—through a dystopian construct and social tragedy.  “The history of the 20th century, where a couple of societies took a crack at utopia on a large scale and ended up with the inferno, would bear out that we have a better idea about how to make hell on earth than we do about how to make heaven,” reflects Atwood.

According to Atwood, science fiction better than a socially realistic novel explores the consequences of upcoming technologies and scientific discoveries, by showing them as fully operational. “We’ve always been good at letting cats out of bags and genies out of bottles,” she says. “We just haven’t been very good at putting them back in again. These stories in their darker modes are all versions of The Sorcerer’s Apprentice: the apprentice finds out how to make the magic salt-grinder produce salt, but he can’t turn it off.” Again, Atwood is talking more about human nature (the theme) than technology (the plot element).

Evoking one of my favorites, William Blake, Atwood shares that it is “still the human imagination, in all its diversity, that directs what we do with our tools. Literature…lets the shadowy forms of thought and feeling—heaven, hell, monsters, angels and all—out into the light, where we can take a good look at them and perhaps come to a better understanding of who we are and what we want, and what the limits to those wants may be. Understanding the imagination is no longer a pastime, but a necessity; because increasingly, if we can imagine it, we’ll be able to do it.”

And speaking of imagination and doing something with it…Yesterday I finally saw the movie Prometheus (still playing in the theatres in Toronto). This science fiction movie by Ridley Scott has had the Internet wildly tweeting and blogging with interpretations that spanned from theories of “space-Jesus” to ancient aliens and panspermia. The movie provides a sweeping canvas on which to explore philosophical, spiritual and scientific questions important to humanity: values and morality like greed, bigotry and racism (through the synthetic being of David), faith and altruism (Shaw); how and why we came to be; what the soul is and what our purpose is. From its arcane references to biblical text in the Planet’s name to the cross hanging around Shaw’s neck, the movie ultimately examines our quest for God (or to be Godlike…) and its consequences. 

That the film and the spaceship are both named Prometheus is apt, says Marc Newman of Flicks & Faith. “In Greek mythology, Prometheus was the Titan who, in pride, determined to steal the fire of the gods and is a symbol of the tragic consequences of overreaching.”  My previous article “A Rose by Any Other Name” discusses the symbolic importance of names in storytelling. No where is this more true and important than in science fiction—the literature of metaphor and allegory.

So, why even make that impertinent statement about needing science fiction? Why do we feel the need to defend this genre and the aliens in it—as I often feel compelled to? Well, that’s fodder for another article; so, I leave you simply with my own defense, or rather one provided by my personal hero SF author Ray Bradbury and what he so eloquently told me: everything in story is metaphor: from heroes and their mentors and antagonists (whether angel or alien), to premise and entire worlds.


Nina Munteanu, A Romanian in Canada

Nina Munteanu is A Romanian in Canada

Nina Munteanu is a Canadian ecologist and novelist. In addition to eight published novels, Nina has written short stories, articles and non-fiction books, which have been translated into several languages throughout the world. Darwin’s Paradox (Dragon Moon, 2007) was the recipient of the Midwest Book Review Reader’s Choice Award and the Delta Optimist Reader’s Choice. Its prequel Angel of Chaos was a finalist for the Foreword Magazine Book of the Year in 2010. Nina regularly publishes reviews and essays in magazines such as The New York Review of Science Fiction and Strange Horizons. She serves as staff writer for several online and print magazines, and was assistant editor-in-chief of Imagikon, a Romanian speculative magazine. Outer Diverse (Starfire, 2011) the first of the Splintered Universe Trilogy, is now an audiobook with Iambik (2012). Her latest book The Last Summoner (Starfire, 2012) is a historical fantasy and currently a Canadian bestseller on Amazon.ca. Nina teaches and coaches writing at the University of Toronto and George Brown College in Toronto, Canada and online. Visit her site Nina Munteanu for more information about her workshops and coaching. Her guidebook on writing, The Fiction Writer: Get Published, Write Now! is used by universities throughout North America. It was translated into Romanian and published by Editura Paralela 45 in 2011 with the title, Manual de Scriere Creativa: scriitorul de fiction. Nina shares her time between Toronto and Lunenburg where she teaches and coaches writers.






Previous articleSolaris by Stanislaw Lem and Steven Soderbergh
Next articleEuroCon 2017: German “DortCon”-Team plans bid


  1. Thanks, Nina!

    I enjoyed writing it. The subject of why we write science fiction and its relevance to our society is always on my mind. I have encountered so many dismissive responses to science fiction by people who don’t read the genre and think they know it–friends, even, who don’t understand what I write (it’s all about space ships, aliens and monsters, isn’t it?) … And even if it was, they don’t recognize the importance of the metaphoric portrayal of “the other” in story …

    To see Margaret Atwood, Canadian literary author, evolve from one who dismissed SF in the same way to one who now embraces it for all it provides, is heartwarming.

    Science fiction has been more embraced in Europe, I think… Europeans seem to understand the metaphoric nature of SF more than North Americans…

    Best Wishes,
    Nina Munteanu

    • That’s a very good question and issue…and one I will write about in an upcoming editorial or article here. Briefly, it depends on your content and your audience. I run several blogs (five) and guest blog on several others. Feedback, of course, depends on first getting lots of traffic to your site. But it isn’t just about traffic either; I get huge traffic on one site with almost no feedback, and lots of feedback on another site with less traffic. The reason is the content and connecting with your readers. If your content is engaging, “conversational” and invites comment (directly and indirectly) you will get more feedback than with content that is more about news and announcements. You are more likely to get comments from your core, regular readership who always read your posts, people you know and have some interaction with, online friends, etc. You build this community by, in turn, taking an interest in them, their blogs, their sites, etc. Using social media like Facebook and Twitter is an excellent way to build this community. There, I’ve written my article! LOL! Hope this helps, Newcastle.

      Best Wishes,

  2. I am a Chinese science fiction readers, I found seemed to be science fiction than in foreign countries in China science fiction is more mature, but science fiction in China also in development,The book three – body by Liu Cixin! I believe that ,and I like foreign authors, too.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.